Hi there,

is it planned to use an symbolic library wihtin SMath without an plugin like the one for Maxima?

Regards

Wrote

is it planned to use an symbolic library wihtin SMath without an plugin like the one for Maxima?

Maxima today was originally Macsyma, the ancestor of the more advanced Maple.
Maple is more direct companion to all versions of Smath.
The Mathcad/Mathsoft Maple was even superior to Maple.
Smath/Maple companion did all symbolic advanced projects.
True: the Maple is not 100% cracked in Smath.
Show something wrt your request.

It is practically possible to use the available sources, but people are needed who will do this.

... try Sagemath, freeware. Pretended as powerful as Maple.

Wrote

... try Sagemath, freeware. Pretended as powerful as Maple.

SMath Studio works on different platforms (Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, web ), so the source code should support this in the same way.
It is very difficult to include other sources if they are not in С#. Therefore, it only makes sense to consider projects in C# for these purposes.

Wrote

is it planned to use an symbolic library wihtin SMath without an plugin like the one for Maxima?

Smath has its own built-in symbolic.
Hover the cursor on a piece of maths to see the internal symbolic.
If you see an expansion, then type this piece of maths and Ctrl+. to expand.