1 Pages (6 items)
Beta: SMath Studio 0.99.6962 (23 January 2019) - Messages
SMath Studio
Tiny, but powerful mathematical program with WYSIWYG editor and complete units of measurements support.
Download
SMathStudioDesktop.0_99_6962.Mono.tar.gz (1.35 MiB) downloaded 1486 time(s).
SMathStudioDesktop.0_99_6962.Setup.msi (2.23 MiB) downloaded 3167 time(s).
Please note:
- There are some known bugs with Worksheet scrolling - will be addressed soon;
- There are some UI issues on environment with high DPI (some Custom plug-ins may not be scaled correctly).
Please use the following to disable high dpi support if required:
To all developers:
As you may notice starting from build 0.99.6955 SMath Studio supports high DPI and in order to scale Regions correctly we have to introduce new requirement:
- Plug-in must use SMath.Drawing.Graphics instead of System.Drawing.Graphics everywhere.
or
- All Fonts created by the plug-in must have GraphicsUnit.Pixel specified as a unit and size must be multiplied by 96f / 72f in order to convert Points to Pixels.
All existing plug-ins should be updated according to this requirement as everything looks ok while system is configured to have use 96 DPI, but in all other cases scaling of Fonts in plug-ins is incorrect.
All modern platforms like iOS, Android, UWP have Pixel specified as a unit by default, so this issue appears on Windows machines only (we have it on Linux as well because of Mono).
Please let me know in case of any related questions. If you are not able to perform changes by yourself - just let me know and I will update plug-ins by myself.
Best regards, Andrey Ivashov.
5 users liked this post
frapuano 2019/1/22 19:55:00, NDTM Amarasekera 2019/1/23 00:05:00, sergio 2019/1/23 08:48:00, Radovan Omorjan 2019/1/23 15:41:00, Oscar Campo 2019/1/23 17:30:00
for infinity, the size.
for pi/euler/boelan equal, the thickness. they should not to be bold actually.
for pi/euler/boelan equal, the thickness. they should not to be bold actually.
Wrote
Hello.
What you do not like exactly? Font? Style (bold)? Both?
Best regards.
By taking into consideration of the silence, should I not wait for change for them?
Regards
As for pi and e, you can easily get rid of the bold face.
Actually, it would be sufficient to just give pre-defined values an upright face.
In the equations below, the rhs pi and e should be bold, shouldn't they?
I like the idea of the boolean equal being visually different from the evaluation operator
![2019-01-31 08_33_59-SMath Studio 0.99.6965 - [Klausur 2018-2.sm_].png](/zh-Hans-CN/files/Download/zRQLsN/2019-01-31-08_33_59-SMath-Studio-0.99.6965---[Klausur-2018-2.sm_].png)
Actually, it would be sufficient to just give pre-defined values an upright face.
In the equations below, the rhs pi and e should be bold, shouldn't they?
I like the idea of the boolean equal being visually different from the evaluation operator
![2019-01-31 08_33_59-SMath Studio 0.99.6965 - [Klausur 2018-2.sm_].png](/zh-Hans-CN/files/Download/zRQLsN/2019-01-31-08_33_59-SMath-Studio-0.99.6965---[Klausur-2018-2.sm_].png)
Martin KraskaPre-configured portable distribution of SMath Studio: https://en.smath.info/wiki/SMath%20with%20Plugins.ashx
1 Pages (6 items)
- New Posts
- No New Posts
