SMath Studio 0.99.6638 (05 March 2018)

SMath Studio 0.99.6638 (05 March 2018) - Messages

#1 Posted: 2018/3/5 14:40:47
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2,315 likes in 3,949 posts.

Group: Super Administrator



matrix_32.PNG

round_3_32.PNG
9 users liked this post
Martin_B 2018/3/5 14:57:00, sergio 2018/3/5 14:59:00, Serg 2018/3/5 15:22:00, Вячеслав Мезенцев 2018/3/5 15:39:00, frapuano 2018/3/5 16:34:00, Martin Kraska 2018/3/5 19:30:00, NDTM Amarasekera 2018/3/5 22:46:00, Davide Carpi 2018/3/6 09:37:00, IVR 2018/3/6 13:29:00
#2 Posted: 2018/3/5 16:01:34
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6,866 posts.

Group: User

For those interested to test useful functionalities 6638

Utilities Matrix_Vector [MCD 4 styles].sm (34.65 KiB) downloaded 832 time(s).
#3 Posted: 2018/3/5 16:17:36
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6,866 posts.

Group: User

Wrote

For those interested to test useful functionalities 6638



Observe ... Q(i,j) is already code "trace"

Q(i,j).PNG
#4 Posted: 2018/3/5 18:11:59
CBG

CBG

78 likes in 312 posts.

Group: User

Every time Smath Studio is updated, something goes wrong. Again failed
to start the plugin Table Region, Smath Studio does not recognize it.


Table_Region_Fail.png



Best Regards


Carlos
#5 Posted: 2018/3/5 18:25:50
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2,315 likes in 3,949 posts.

Group: Super Administrator

Carlos,

Wrote

Every time Smath Studio is updated, something goes wrong.


Yeah, its a life...

Fixed (please update a plug-in). Thank you!
#6 Posted: 2018/3/5 21:18:38
CBG

CBG

78 likes in 312 posts.

Group: User

It already works!

Thank you very much.


Best regards

Carlos
#7 Posted: 2018/3/5 22:23:16
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6,866 posts.

Group: User

Wrote

Every time Smath Studio is updated, something goes wrong.


That's why I'm 6179 for productive projects.


#8 Posted: 2018/3/5 22:49:16
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6,866 posts.

Group: User

round.PNG
#9 Posted: 2018/3/5 22:51:23
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6,866 posts.

Group: User

CeilFloor.PNG
#10 Posted: 2018/3/6 03:44:16
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2,315 likes in 3,949 posts.

Group: Super Administrator

Wrote

Wrote

Every time Smath Studio is updated, something goes wrong.


That's why I'm 6179 for productive projects.


In this case you have to live with slow performance, tens of critical known (and already fixed) bugs. You can't use new features and make your future switch to newer version harder. There is no even any guarantee that your worksheets can be supported by latest SMath Studio versions (yeah, in SMath history we had couple of such situations when a part of calculation can not be handled anymore, unfortunately).

So, I can't say that it is good approach.
#11 Posted: 2018/3/6 03:46:47
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2,315 likes in 3,949 posts.

Group: Super Administrator

Wrote

CeilFloor.PNG


Are you kidding? And what about 2.35, -9.465 and etc?
#12 Posted: 2018/3/6 13:03:49
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6,866 posts.

Group: User

Page11 Floor.sm (12.43 KiB) downloaded 1033 time(s).
#13 Posted: 2018/3/14 18:46:18
Alexander O. Melnik

Alexander O. Melnik

127 likes in 498 posts.

Group: Moderator

A bug in functionality of vectorize() was introduced between 0.99.6617 and 0.99.6638. Will this be addressed?

File not found.File not found.

#14 Posted: 2018/3/15 01:09:35
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6,866 posts.

Group: User

Wrote

A bug in functionality of vectorize() was introduced between 0.99.6617 and 0.99.6638



That it was introduced between 6617 & 6638, that is surprising ?
Even if it did work, to me, it is not correct because it will cause
something wrong sooner or later, because to reflexive in the
calculation kernel ... Murphy's law. I have experimented disastrous
situations [crash ... push the button to stop].
Occasionally, to isolate, you have to spool to file.

Cheers Alex ... Jean

AlexBug.PNG
#15 Posted: 2018/3/15 14:12:50
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2,315 likes in 3,949 posts.

Group: Super Administrator

Wrote

A bug in functionality of vectorize() was introduced between 0.99.6617 and 0.99.6638. Will this be addressed?


Jean are right, this didn't work initially, but started working at some point because of another bug Yes, I'm not kidding.

I've investigated this example and was able to make it work together with all other examples I have about vectorize(..) function. All tests executed OK.
So, I decided to include this improvement into new release: https://en.smath.info/forum/yaf_postst12594_RC-0-99-6648--15-March-2018.aspx

Please test examples you have with vectorize(..) function.

Best regards.
1 users liked this post
sergio 2018/3/15 15:12:00
  • New Posts
  • No New Posts