I don't see any calculus symbols

I don't see any calculus symbols - Messaggi

#1 Pubblicato: 08/05/2014 00:55:47
p3aul

p3aul

0 apprezzamenti in 10 post.

Gruppo: User

I don't see anything related to calculus.
#2 Pubblicato: 08/05/2014 03:01:01
Martin Kraska

Martin Kraska

1.361 apprezzamenti in 2.275 post.

Gruppo: Moderator

OK, let's try happy guessing based on near to zero information about what you actually see and what you expect.

You might try to type int or diff and see what choices the dynamic assistant can offer.
int-da.PNG
Technische Mechanik mit SMath Studio: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-50592-9
#3 Pubblicato: 08/05/2014 22:30:37
p3aul

p3aul

0 apprezzamenti in 10 post.

Gruppo: User

I see so much of Maxima here. Is Smath just a sheetlike shell for wxMaxima?
#4 Pubblicato: 10/05/2014 22:08:51
p3aul

p3aul

0 apprezzamenti in 10 post.

Gruppo: User

Well, by your non-replies I guess you an answered my question. Not that that's a bad thing, I was just curious.
#5 Pubblicato: 11/05/2014 01:41:24
Radovan Omorjan

Radovan Omorjan

325 apprezzamenti e 1 disapprezzamenti in 2.052 post.

Gruppo: Moderator

Wrote

I see so much of Maxima here. Is Smath just a sheetlike shell for wxMaxima?


I do not think we can say that SMath is a shell for wxMAxima. SMath Maxima plugin does not use wxMaxima but uses Maxima. The Maxima plugin (as well as Maple plugin) appeared and were made by the good willing people because SMath has rather problematic symbolic engine in its core. Moreover, As SMath is similar to Mathcad in its graphical interface, I think we can not say that Mathcad is a shell for Maple or MuPAD symbolic engines. However, I do not think you can use Mathcad separately from these engines, but you can use Smath without Maxima or Maple plugins.

Regards,
Radovan
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
1 utenti hanno apprezzato questo post
Davide Carpi 11/05/2014 06:34:00
  • Nuovi post
  • Nessun nuovo post