Different solution with MathCAD - why?

Different solution with MathCAD - why? - definite integral - Mensajes

#1 Publicado: 7/3/2019 5:20:13
wschrabi

wschrabi

0 me gusta en 2 mensajes.

Grupo: User

Hi
I have tried to calculate this elliptic Integral with MathCAD v15 and SMath.
But I get a Different solution with MathCAD - why? Thanks for help.

WaLTER


Eliptic.sm (17,31 KiB) descargado 1178 vez(es).
#2 Publicado: 7/3/2019 5:54:20
Davide Carpi

Davide Carpi

1.443 me gusta en 2.936 mensajes.

Grupo: Moderator

Hello Walter,

results are different because you are making another calculation:
  • numerator of the mathcad function is l (lowercase L) while in SMath is 1 (one);
  • upper bound of the integral is e (Euler's number) in mathcad, while is 0.5 in SMath;
If you like my plugins please consider to support the program buying a license; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects
#3 Publicado: 7/3/2019 6:02:35
wschrabi

wschrabi

0 me gusta en 2 mensajes.

Grupo: User

Thanks - I really did not see this.
#4 Publicado: 7/3/2019 6:29:45
NDTM Amarasekera

NDTM Amarasekera

130 me gusta en 352 mensajes.

Grupo: User

Clipboard01.jpg
Look within!... The secret is inside you. Best Regards Eng. NDTM Amarasekera - Sri Lanka
#5 Publicado: 7/3/2019 11:12:47
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 me gusta en 6.866 mensajes.

Grupo: User

Wrote

Thanks for help.


Always plot the integrand to avoid disaster.
Simpson integrator ranges from exact to absolute scrap.
In doubt, sanity vs Mathcad 11 adaptive.
In your example: watch the low limit.
Alternately, sanity Wolfram Integrator

Jean

Eliptic (1).sm (27,6 KiB) descargado 1219 vez(es).

  • Nuevos mensajes
  • Sin mensajes nuevos