This a solver for electrical circuits with the MNA method, here implemented as "stamps" for each linear circuit element. That's meaning that it's modular: can be extended adding more circuit elements stamps. To do: add nullors, diodes, transistors and describe how to handle subciruits.

mna_stamps.sm (405,83 KiB) descargado 1685 vez(es).

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Alvaro,

Awesome work! I'm excited to start using this. I see a lot of potential uses. I did have a question regarding your algorithm. In the attached segment, what is the purpose of repeating the for-loop inside the if/else condition on the right? I get the purpose of the for-loop to select the correct Stamp prefix, but do not see the benefit of added if/else on right side.


Thanks,
alyles

Wrote

This a solver for electrical circuits with the MNA method, here implemented as "stamps" for each linear circuit element. That's meaning that it's modular: can be extended adding more circuit elements stamps. To do: add nullors, diodes, transistors and describe how to handle subciruits.

mna_stamps.sm (405,83 KiB) descargado 1685 vez(es).

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Nice work! and thanks for the use of one of my very old posts!!

Wrote

Alvaro,

Awesome work! I'm excited to start using this. I see a lot of potential uses. I did have a question regarding your algorithm. In the attached segment, what is the purpose of repeating the for-loop inside the if/else condition on the right? I get the purpose of the for-loop to select the correct Stamp prefix, but do not see the benefit of added if/else on right side.

Thanks,
alyles

Hi alyles. Thanks for your words. As you say, the first loop it's for choose the correct Stamp with the first circuit element letter. The if ensure that if the string is largest than one, then can take a substring largest, but there are a bug there: must to be substr(str#, 1, 2), for make avaible the use of two letters too as stamp identifier.

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Hi. In the attached, bug about selecting stamps pointing by alyles not "corrected" but just eliminate the second loop. Also shows how to work with a pulse train, choosing a true periodic laplace transform from the input signal, not only the transform that figures on the books.

opamp integrator.sm (316,26 KiB) descargado 1627 vez(es).

opamp integrator.pdf (464,25 KiB) descargado 1067 vez(es).

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Hi. In the attached, bug for selecting stamps corrected. Also frequency domain analysis tools for use with MNA analysis: BodeMag, BodePhase, ZP Plot, Nyquist and Nichols charts.

mna_RLC_freq_domain.pdf (308,9 KiB) descargado 945 vez(es).
mna_RLC_freq_domain.sm (187,22 KiB) descargado 1643 vez(es).

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Hello Alvaro, nice work!

I was planning to convert the attached (copy of) MathCad worksheet, but it seemed difficult for me. Would some of the routines, or stamps work in place of the solve block?

I welcome your review and look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,

NormRLC step response - MC.pdf (695,17 KiB) descargado 1016 vez(es).

Hi Norm. Thanks. This is what think that you can do with the MNA method.

RLC Norma.sm (194,82 KiB) descargado 1518 vez(es).
RLC Norma.pdf (175,12 KiB) descargado 970 vez(es).

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Wrote

I was planning to convert the attached (copy of) MathCad worksheet, but it seemed difficult for me.

If you can setup in form of DE [Differential Equation]
It will surely have a Laplace solution easy to extract.

Many thanks Alvaro!

The "Thanks" icon presented an error.

Norm

Wrote

The "Thanks" icon presented an error.

This is a long lasting/reported bug.

If you can setup in form of DE [Differential Equation]
It will surely have a Laplace solution easy to extract.

Thanks Jean, I'll try that as well... if I do it correctly.

Norm

Wrote

Ifyou can setup in form of DE [Differential Equation]
It will surely have a Laplace solution easy to extract.

Thanks Jean, I'll try that as well... if I do it correctly.

The technical approach is simply write the Laplace algebra
of the circuit ... maple, bingo/done.
Literature call it H(s) ... I call it L(s).
You can find some examples browsing the web.
Those operational [symbol triangle] supplier
should give the L(s). Here is an old example.

Jean

Maths Laplace Circuit Algebra.sm (38,29 KiB) descargado 1541 vez(es).

Hello Alvaro, I hope you are well in this challenging time.

The MNA worksheet throws an error when I updated to version 0.99(build: 7610). It worked fine before then.

Here's the sheet:

RLC Norma.sm (194,94 KiB) descargado 1551 vez(es).

The error:
Error.pdf (8,16 KiB) descargado 850 vez(es).

I welcome your review and recommendation(s) to repair the issue.

Stay safe and take care.

Sincerely,

Norm

Hi Norm. Thanks for the good wishes. I hope you are well too. First issue is that new versions can't get the number of rows in the stamps matrix. So, change rows(E#) by it's value, 12.



That make almost all other calculus ok. But there are also a bug in SMath when when you invert matrices with units. For some reason, you must to change A#^-1 by maple(invert(A#)) for calculate the voltage in the first calculus with units (in this case for the current SMath can invert the matrix)



Now there are only one last red in a plot, but can't remember why is it.

RLC Norma.pdf (146,53 KiB) descargado 964 vez(es).
RLC Norma.sm (194,95 KiB) descargado 1580 vez(es).

Finally, in the meantime I improve the Peaks function

MPeaks.sm (16,49 KiB) descargado 1541 vez(es).

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Many thanks, for your prompt reply and fixes!

Sincerely,

Norm

Really good job! I have to try it !!