Some future requests - Messages
while working with (<3) SMath Studio, I missed some functions that could be very useful for me in writing tasks for other students.
- change the size of footer and header.
- while setting dot for comma, after typing comma a multiplication appears. Would be nice if, after typing comma here, the dot comma appears. In the opposite way it works.
- !insert indices and potencies in normal text!
- typing more boolean alike without that irritating clips to appear
- the area name should also appear at the end of the area shouldnt it? And if I could close an area at the end of it too, that would be great.
thanks for reading
You have that from the Writer region.
- typing more boolean alike without that irritating clips to appear.
Smath brackets differently than other, more conventional script style.
Personally, I prefer Smath convention.
- change the size of footer and header.
Header/Footer have legal authority in native Windows.
Why do you want to freak the law ?
Multiplication exists in 3 styles [2*ln(x), 2.ln(x), implicit 2ln(x)
Smath style is unique 2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9=362880
Implicit style is confusing.
coma [,] or [;] for arguments separators.
What is an area ?
In Smath, you insert an area to collapse math/text/image ... regions.
typing more boolean alike without that irritating clips to appear
Just to clarify, parentheses in booleans were introduced because often calculations of newbies were affected of wrong statements in if() functions, where you might be tempted to use something like a
BTW, if neeeded, in Custom functions there is a set of functions that wraps ternary comparisons:
- !insert indices and potencies in normal text!
You have that from the Writer region.
Ah. Thank you
Thats very useful.
- change the size of footer and header.
Header/Footer have legal authority in native Windows.
Why do you want to freak the law ?
just a request >_>
Maybe we forget about that.
Multiplication exists in 3 styles [2*ln(x), 2.ln(x), implicit 2ln(x)
Smath style is unique 2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9=362880
Implicit style is confusing.
coma [,] or [;] for arguments separators.
I should explain that with a picture.
What is an area ?
In Smath, you insert an area to collapse math/text/image ... regions.
typing more boolean alike without that irritating clips to appear
Just to clarify, parentheses in booleans were introduced because often calculations of newbies were affected of wrong statements in if() functions, where you might be tempted to use something like a
Now I understand. Thanks for the Information.
typing more boolean alike without that irritating clips to appear
Just to clarify, parentheses in booleans were introduced because often calculations of newbies ... the same obviously with other operations like a=b=c.
Hi. Or can hack the sm file deleting where "(" appears:
HackingEqual.sm
Best regards.
Alvaro.
Hi. Or can hack the sm file deleting where "(" appears:
HackingEqual.sm
Best regards.
Alvaro.
Very nice, exactly what I wanted.
Copy paste or changing the content doesn´t work unfortunately.
Is it difficult to do that or is there an easy way?
Very nice, exactly what I wanted.
Copy paste or changing the content doesn't work unfortunately.
Is it difficult to do that or is there an easy way?
Is it difficult to do that or is there an easy way?
Hi G-Tate. Difficult. I edit the sm file with a text editor and delete the "bracket" lines:
Best regards.
Alvaro.
- typing more boolean alike without that irritating clips to appear
The style you are looking for, i.e: multiple = without bracket
was the style Smath 5346. The bracket style appeared SMath 6179.
IMHO, the bracket style is necessary in other instances, thus generalized.
Hi G-Tate. Difficult. I edit the sm file with a text editor and delete the "bracket" lines:
Best regards.
Alvaro.
Thanks very much!
Thats a nice trick to know.
But of course not the real solution.
The style you are looking for, i.e: multiple = without bracket
was the style Smath 5346. The bracket style appeared SMath 6179.
IMHO, the bracket style is necessary in other instances, thus generalized.
Thanks Jean, I unterstand that.
You see, it was just a request and I could spare some time being able to have an operator with the possibility to have multiple "=" to set some defintions.
With the trick from Razonar I will be fine for now, if searching and deleting the bracket lines doesnt gets to costly.
Thank you guys.
Also it could be very interesting to have two more buttons: "f sub x" for f(x) and "f sub x,y" for f(x,y). For example, with "f sub x" you can write successions terms in the usual way, a[n], instead a(n), or define some interesting for partial derivatives, deltas, nablas, sums, products ... ∂ ∆ ∏ ∑ with one or two subscripts.
Best regards
Alvaro.
-
New Posts
-
No New Posts